{"id":1067,"date":"2006-04-17T01:03:02","date_gmt":"2006-04-17T01:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2006-09-28T12:09:42","modified_gmt":"2006-09-28T12:09:42","slug":"hiltzik_of_the","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=1067","title":{"rendered":"Hiltzik of the LA Times &#8211; Unethical Or Just Ignorant?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve <a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/archives\/006167.php\" target=\"browser\">had<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/archives\/007934.php\" target=\"browser\">fun<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/archives\/007963.php\" target=\"browser\">reading<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/goldenstateblog.latimes.com\/goldenstate\/\" target=\"browser\">Michael Hiltzik<\/a> in the past, mostly because he&#8217;s an interesting case of a major newspaper trying on the blog form. He manages, I think to combine the worst of both &#8211; the overweening arrogance of the MSM and the casual, fact-challenged style of much blogging. He&#8217;s sadly modeling himself on some weird hybrid of TBogg and Atrios, and under the impression that spittle-flecked indignation is what the personal voice of blogging is all about.<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/hughhewitt.com\/archives\/2006\/04\/09-week\/index.php#a001896\" target=\"browser\">Hugh Hewitt<\/a> has been hammering the Times, and suggesting that their circulation decline (3% year to year) is related to their political leanings (I&#8217;m doubtful that this is the whole or even the majority of the reason, but Hugh gets to make his argument).<\/p>\n<p>Hiltzik replies with a <a href=\"http:\/\/goldenstateblog.latimes.com\/goldenstate\/2006\/04\/the_incredible_.html\" target=\"browser\">typically classless<\/a> slam at Hugh &#8211; suggesting that his blog traffic is down and implying that it&#8217;s his conservative stance that&#8217;s responsible.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s what Michael says (links in original):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><\/p>\n<p>So I think it&#8217;s worthwhile to put our results in perspective by asking the question: How is Hugh&#8217;s blog doing? Luckily, he has provided us with the answer, thanks to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sitemeter.com\/?a=home\">Site Meter<\/a>, a program he uses to track visits to his website. I&#8217;ve been keeping an eye on Hugh&#8217;s Site Meter, which appears on his home page, since early February. All I can say to him is: Uh-oh.<\/p>\n<p>Back on February 11, when I began this project, Hewitt&#8217;s Site Meter showed there had been 295,874 visits over the previous seven days, for a daily average of 42,268. But by yesterday, April 13, the running seven-day count had declined to 238,782, for a daily average of only 34,112. <\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s a 19.3% decline in Hewitt&#8217;s visitor count over a span of <em>only two months<\/em>. The loss hasn&#8217;t been strictly in a straight line, but it <em>has <\/em>been steady. <\/p>\n<p><\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Got that? Now click through on the &#8216;Site Meter&#8217; link in the quote. Go ahead &#8211; I&#8217;ll wait.<\/p>\n<p>You get the generic Site Meter home page.<\/p>\n<p>Let me introduce Mr. Hiltzik to my little friend, the Internet. One of the things we do, typically, is to link directly to the thing we&#8217;re discussing, so that people can look for themselves and validate (or, in this case, invalidate) our claims. Here&#8217;s the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sitemeter.com\/stats.asp?site=s18hewitt\" target=\"browser\">actual link<\/a> to Hugh&#8217;s Site Meter. Go ahead and click through and let me know if you see a secular decline.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/patterico.com\/2006\/04\/16\/4451\/hiltzik-mocks-hewitts-site-meter\/\" target=\"browser\">Patterico<\/a> hammered Hiltzik for misrepresenting the numbers (amplified by <a href=\"http:\/\/independentsources.com\/2006\/04\/16\/the-los-angeles-times-michael-hiltzik-abuses-web-stats-for-fun-and-profit\/\" target=\"browser\">Independent Source&#8217;s<\/a> look at Hugh&#8217;s Alexa ratings, which go back further than his Sitemeter numbers do. <\/p>\n<p>I want to pile on, and suggest that while I&#8217;ve looked at some of Patrick&#8217;s more aggressive claims about Hiltzik&#8217;s intellectual honesty as  a bit over the top, I was wrong &#8211; Hiltzik is just plain dishonest.<\/p>\n<p>I can&#8217;t imagine another reason why &#8211; having look at the actual numbers from Sitemeter for Hugh&#8217;s site &#8211; he wouldn&#8217;t have included the link, except on the assumption that his readers would simply take his word for it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Michael Hiltzik acts badly again. Hint for him: when you make a claim that can be challenged, and there&#8217;s a link that can prove or disprove your claim &#8211; include it.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1067"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1067"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1067\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1067"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1067"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1067"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}