{"id":1402,"date":"2007-04-12T15:13:55","date_gmt":"2007-04-12T15:13:55","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2007-04-12T15:27:16","modified_gmt":"2007-04-12T15:27:16","slug":"truth_speach_ph","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=1402","title":{"rendered":"Truth, Speach, Philosophy, Duke"},"content":{"rendered":"

An old post from armedliberal.com back in 2002 which seems highly appropriate in light of yesterday’s Duke acquittals, and this post at Maggie’s Farm<\/a>:<\/i><\/p>\n

The War on Bad Philosophy continues.<\/b><\/p>\n

I’m still working today, so I can’t give this the depth it deserves, but I want to point folks to an article on Free Speech and Postmodernism<\/a>, by Stephen Hicks, a Randian liberal arts professor, and commentary<\/a> on the article by Arthur Silber on his blog Voice of Reason. (link originally via Instapundit<\/a>)<\/I><\/p>\n

First, I’m not a big fan of Rand and Randians. As a group, they tend to exhibit the confusion between logic and reason that many bright teenagers display (I should know, I’ve got two…). But while there is a framework in both articles I’d take some exception to (and will when I get a moment), there are a couple of 18kt gems worth pulling out and handing around. From Hicks:<\/p>\n

What we have then are two positions about the nature of speech. The postmodernists say: Speech is a weapon<\/u> in the conflict<\/u> between groups<\/u> that are unequal<\/u>. And that is diametrically opposed to the liberal view of speech, which says: Speech is a tool of cognition and communication<\/u> for individuals<\/u> who are free<\/u>.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

If we adopt the first statement, then the solution is going to be some form of enforced altruism, under which we redistribute speech in order to protect the harmed, weaker groups. If the stronger, white males have speech tools they can use to the detriment of the other groups, then don’t let them use those speech tools. Generate a list of denigrating words that harm members of the other groups and prohibit members of the powerful groups from using them. Don’t let them use the words that reinforce their own racism and sexism, and don’t let them use words that make members of other groups feel threatened. Eliminating those speech advantages will reconstruct our social reality – which is the same goal as affirmative action. <\/p>\n

A striking consequence of this analysis is that the toleration of “anything goes” in speech becomes censorship. The postmodern argument implies that if anything goes, then that gives permission to the dominant groups to keep on saying the things that keep the subordinate groups in their place. Liberalism thus means helping to silence the subordinate groups and letting only the dominant groups have effective speech. Postmodern speech codes, therefore, are not censorship but a form of liberation – they liberate the subordinated groups from the punishing and silencing effects of the powerful groups’ speech, and they provide an atmosphere in which the previously subordinated groups can express themselves. Speech codes equalize the playing field.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I haven’t read a better description of the postmodernist take on speech and power.<\/p>\n

I believe Hicks to be off base in his explanation of the root of this construction; he explains it as a political tactic adopted as the previous tactic – affirmative action – began to fail. He’s wrong; this is a manifestation of the underlying philosophy behind affirmative action – the primacy of group identification, and the construction of politics as conflicts between identified groups.<\/p>\n

I’d suggest going back to Marcuse’s ‘Repressive Tolerance’ for a historic touchstone.<\/p>\n

A bit more bloggage then back to work…<\/p>\n

…2002 was an interesting year, wasn’t it?<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Armed Liberal exhumes an old post on the role of speech.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1402"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1402\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}