{"id":1667,"date":"2008-03-08T22:00:29","date_gmt":"2008-03-08T22:00:29","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2008-03-08T22:01:25","modified_gmt":"2008-03-08T22:01:25","slug":"wherein_i_agree","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=1667","title":{"rendered":"Wherein I Agree With Glenn Greenwald AND John McCain &#8211; And Yet My Head Does Not Explode"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;m hanging in the lobby of our hotel in Fayetteville with Biggest Guy, we&#8217;re both surfing the web and he brings up <a href=\"http:\/\/cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com\/up\/ynews;_ylt=Alv0MKsnPncb7UJlAVtAYB_cKs0F?ch=4226716&#038;cl=6853001&#038;lang=en\" target=\"browser\">the video of McCain and the NYT reporter Elisabeth Bumiller<\/a>. We watched it and I asked him what he thought &#8211; he enjoyed it, and thought it made McCain look good. Shockingly, I kind of agreed. I&#8217;ve mentioned the incident where Giscard d&#8217;Estaing blew off a reporter who asked him about his illegitimate daughter &#8211; at the time, I was focused on politicians erecting a wall around their private lives. Looking at the McCain video, I realize that a big part of it was a politician stepping out of the role of sniffing the rear of the press to try and ensure a good relationship and, hopefully, good coverage. Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.memeorandum.com\/\" target=\"browser\">Memorandum<\/a>, I also see <a href=\"http:\/\/www.salon.com\/opinion\/greenwald\/2008\/03\/08\/carlson\/\" target=\"browser\">Glenn Greenwald making the same point<\/a> from the other side &#8211; about the way that the US press is a willing partner in the coverage tango, citing Tucker Carlson interviewing the reporter for the Scotsman whose interview tubed Samantha Power.<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s the quote (but go over and read Greenwald&#8217;s commentary as well):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>CARLSON: What &#8212; she wanted it off the record. Typically, the arrangement is if someone you&#8217;re interviewing wants a quote off the record, you give it to them off the record. Why didn&#8217;t you do that? <\/p>\n<p>PEEV: <b>Are you really that acquiescent in the United States?<\/b> In the United Kingdom, journalists believe that on or off the record is a principle that&#8217;s decided <b>ahead of the interview<\/b>. If a figure in public life. <\/p>\n<p>CARLSON: Right. <\/p>\n<p>PEEV: Someone who&#8217;s ostensibly going to be an advisor to the man who could be the most powerful politician in the world, if she makes a comment and decides it&#8217;s a bit too controversial and <b>wants to withdraw it immediately after, unfortunately if the interview is on the record, it has to go ahead<\/b>. <\/p>\n<p>CARLSON: Right. Well, it&#8217;s a little. <\/p>\n<p>PEEV: I didn&#8217;t set out in any way, shape. <\/p>\n<p>CARLSON: Right. But I mean, since journalistic standards in Great Britain are so much dramatically lower than they are here, it&#8217;s a little much being lectured on journalistic ethics by a reporter from the &#8220;Scotsman,&#8221; but I wonder if you could just explain what you think <b>the effect is on the relationship between the press and the powerful. People don&#8217;t talk to you when you go out of your way to hurt them as you did in this piece. <\/p>\n<p>Don&#8217;t you think that hurts the rest of us in our effort to get to the truth from the principals in these campaigns?<\/b> <\/p>\n<p>PEEV: If this is the first time that candid remarks have been published about what one campaign team thinks of the other candidate, then I would argue that <b>your journalists aren&#8217;t doing a very good job of getting to the truth<\/b>. Now I did not go out of my way in any way, shape or form to hurt Miss Power. I believe she&#8217;s an intelligent and perfectly affable woman. In fact, she&#8217;s &#8212; she is incredibly intelligent so she &#8212; who knows she may have known what she was doing. <\/p>\n<p>She regretted it. She probably acted with integrity. It&#8217;s not for me to decide one way or the other whether she did the right thing. But I did not go out and try to end her career.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>See also <a href=\"http:\/\/www.powerlineblog.com\/archives2\/2008\/03\/019981.php\" target=\"browser\">Powerline&#8217;s<\/a> dismissal of Power and <a href=\"http:\/\/news.bbc.co.uk\/2\/hi\/programmes\/hardtalk\/7281805.stm\" target=\"browser\">the contentious interview with the BBC<\/a>. I&#8217;m still digesting, and not sure I 100% agree re Power &#8211; but that&#8217;s real interviewing, not setting someone up for a puff &#8211; or hit &#8211; piece.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A contentious media is a good media.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1667"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}