{"id":2706,"date":"2002-12-05T17:12:59","date_gmt":"2002-12-05T17:12:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/staging.armedliberal.com\/?p=463"},"modified":"2002-12-05T17:12:59","modified_gmt":"2002-12-05T17:12:59","slug":"me-oww","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=2706","title":{"rendered":"ME-OWW!!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I was just planning to excoriate <a href=\u0094http:\/\/williamburton.blogspot.com\/\u0094 target=\u0094browser\u0094>William Burton<\/a> (I\u0092m in that kind of mood; even my friends better watch their asses\u0085) for <a href=http:\/\/williamburton.blogspot.com\/2002_12_01_williamburton_archive.html#85493974 target=\u0094browser\u0094>this post<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><I>I would first point out that <b>the traditional Democratic donor groups don&#8217;t scare me<\/b>, nor do they scare most people likely to vote Democratic.<b> The unions, trial lawyers, environmental groups, abortion rights groups, and socially liberal Hollywood types<\/b> are the most solidly Democratic donor constituencies. Try as they might, the Republicans have never gotten significant numbers of people to vote against the Democrats because of who gives money to them (people may vote pro-life, but they&#8217;re not changing their votes if the Democrats stop taking money from NARAL). <b>These traditional Democratic donor groups line up pretty closely with good Democratic policies<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p><b>The problems occur when Democrats start relying on money from traditionally Republican groups<\/b>. When Democrats start depending on money from banks, from insurance companies, from the investor class, and from big business in general, then they find themselves in an untenable position. To keep these donors happy, they must abandon traditional Democratic policies and the political advantages that come from representing the majority of the American people against those with outsized power and influence.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He\u0092s wrong in more than a couple of ways here\u0085<br \/>\n\u0085but because I\u0092m so effing backlogged, I didn\u0092t get around to it until he\u0092d <a href=http:\/\/williamburton.blogspot.com\/2002_12_01_williamburton_archive.html#85533163 target=\u0094browser\u0094>posted this<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><I>I believe that <b>FDR&#8217;s appeal was not to minorities, the poor, and to union members just because they belonged to those groups<\/b> (even in the 30&#8217;s that wasn&#8217;t enough to win elections). I believe that his appeal to them was part of his greater appeal to huge chunks of the American electorate. That appeal was more psychological than based on race or other identity.  <b>FDR spoke to and for what America as a whole was feeling during the 30&#8217;s and 40&#8217;s<\/b>, and that is still applicable today. <\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;d say that FDR had two basic constituencies, with a great deal of overlap: <b>the anxious<\/b> and <b>the powerless<\/b>. Speak to those constituencies today and you win elections (a great deal of Reagan&#8217;s popularity was his appeal to those who felt anxious about the future and those who felt powerless in the face of government). <\/p>\n<p>Whatever the drawbacks (and they&#8217;re too many to list) of the era, <b>there was a lot less anxiety in the 50&#8217;s and early 60&#8217;s than there is now<\/b>. If you had a job assembling cars,  you could be pretty sure that the job would stick around and that you&#8217;d be able to support your family with it. If you had a job in middle management at GM or at a bank, you could be pretty sure that job would be there your whole life. If your kids were in college, then you could be pretty sure that good jobs would be waiting for them when they graduated. <b>Things were more predictable, and that made people less anxious<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>Compare that to the 30&#8217;s and 40&#8217;s, in which the Great Depression and war made everyone anxious. You couldn&#8217;t be sure that your job would be there in a year. You couldn&#8217;t be sure your son would be alive in a year. You couldn&#8217;t even be sure that your way of life would be around much longer. FDR dealt with this anxiety by letting people know that we were all in this together, and by using the government to actively make things better. He knew that <b>when things are bad, people don&#8217;t want the government to simply step out of the way and let nature take its course (the Hoover approach); they want the government to step in and make things better. <\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>This activist approach to government is very popular and should be just as big selling point for the Democrats now as it was then<\/b>. While social dislocation and unemployment is nothing close to what it was in the 30&#8217;s and the <i><b>War on Some Terror Funded by Some People (none of whom happen to be Saudi)<\/b><\/i> pales in comparison to WWII, the public today is still quite anxious. A factory employee, a middle manager, even a professional doesn&#8217;t know for sure that his job will be there in a year. If it&#8217;s not, he doesn&#8217;t know for sure he&#8217;ll be able to replace it. He doesn&#8217;t know if his kids will find good jobs when they graduate college; nor does he know what the world will be like in even a few years. <b>This leads to a lot of anxiety, and elections will go to those who act to calm it and are willing to take steps to make things better<\/b>.<\/I><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Damn.<br \/>\nHow can I criticize someone who\u0092s so perfectly right?? I\u0092m gonna go home and kick the cats instead.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was just planning to excoriate William Burton (I\u0092m in that kind of mood; even my friends better watch their asses\u0085) for this post: I would first point out that the traditional Democratic donor groups don&#8217;t scare me, nor do they scare most people likely to vote Democratic. The unions, trial lawyers, environmental groups, abortion [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2706"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2706"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2706\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}