{"id":513,"date":"2004-09-03T23:04:27","date_gmt":"2004-09-03T23:04:27","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2006-09-28T12:08:46","modified_gmt":"2006-09-28T12:08:46","slug":"more_malkin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=513","title":{"rendered":"More Malkin"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Over at <a href=\"http:\/\/volokh.com\/posts\/1094234176.shtml\" target=\"browser\">Volokh<\/a>, Eric Muller is discussing the standards that the mass media use when they select what works of history to cover and who to have as commentators. I&#8217;ve always assumed that they used the same standards they use in selecting what show to put on, which is &#8211; <i>what will draw ratings without getting me in trouble?<\/i><\/p>\n<p>That&#8217;s not enough for Muller (and possibly not for <a href=\"http:\/\/hnn.us\/blogs\/entries\/7143.html\" target=\"browser\">Timothy Burke<\/a>, the historian whose post on HNN analyzing the same issue Muller riffs from). In both cases &#8211; more in Muller&#8217;s case than Burke&#8217;s, I think &#8211; the argument I read is that there is an &#8216;ought&#8217; involved; i.e. that it is more than a question of<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>How does the mass media decide what\u2019s worth their attention, what authors belong on talk shows and op-ed pages? This is what I take the Historians\u2019 Committee on Fairness to have been asking about Michelle Malkin. I may have been harsh about the clumsy way they rhetorically invoked the norms of historical scholarship, but the basic question is a fair one. Why Michelle Malkin and not many other authors of readable, interesting works of history, or for that matter, authors of dense, scholarly works of history?<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>but that somehow, professionally legitimated works should have priority. Burke says:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>If this is true, the question becomes potent: why is Michelle Malkin on the air now? Because if talk show producers consult experts on internment, they&#8217;d certainly find that almost everyone thinks Malkin&#8217;s work is shoddy and inaccurate, quite aside from its ethical character. If talk show hosts read and assess work independently to decide whether it is worth covering, then I&#8217;m hard-pressed to understand why they think Malkin&#8217;s is legitimate.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>One thing that I will take away from my experience as a blogger (and no, I&#8217;m not quitting today or anything) is a profound change in how I read the newspapers and (when I do) watch the news. I am more aware of the &#8216;sociology&#8217; of the media than I was before.<\/p>\n<p>But as critical as I often am about the media, I&#8217;m not quite ready to write prescriptions just yet. And I&#8217;m certainly not ready to write a prescription, as Muller suggests in his letter, for &#8216;expert&#8217; filtering of what we should see.<\/p>\n<p>Somehow my response &#8211; that we need to be careful about filtering experience through our beliefs, no matter how legitimately held &#8211; brings up an old Latin phrase I read once in a biography of Galileo&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><i>Neque enim quaero intelligere ut credam, sed credo ut intelligam.<\/i> &#8211; which means &#8220;For neither do I seek to understand in order that I may believe, but I believe in order that I may understand.&#8221; &#8211;Anselm of Canterbury<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Over at Volokh, Eric Muller is discussing the standards that the mass media use when they select what works of history to cover and who to have as commentators. I&#8217;ve always assumed that they used the same standards they use in selecting what show to put on, which is &#8211; what will draw ratings without [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=513"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/513\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=513"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=513"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=513"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}