{"id":1223,"date":"2006-09-29T01:18:52","date_gmt":"2006-09-29T01:18:52","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2006-09-29T01:31:48","modified_gmt":"2006-09-29T01:31:48","slug":"a_new_definitio","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=1223","title":{"rendered":"A New Definition Of &#8216;Chutzpah&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s an old joke in which &#8220;chutzpah&#8221; (Yiddish for &#8216;nerve&#8217;) is defined by a young man who has killed both his parents and throws himself on the mercy of the court because he&#8217;s an orphan.<\/p>\n<p>Today, we have a new definition.<\/p>\n<p>Political seer Matt Stoller <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mydd.com\/story\/2006\/9\/28\/162743\/715\" target=\"browser\">writes about Joe Lieberman<\/a> (in response to Lieberman&#8217;s interview at Pajamas Media):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Lieberman is throwing the whole party under the bus.  It&#8217;s time for 2008 candidates to step up.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Matt, let me say here and publicly that this proves you&#8217;re an idiot. Lieberman didn&#8217;t throw the party under the bus &#8211; you tried to throw him under it, and are going to fail, and are being petulant about it.<\/p>\n<p>How did you think he was going to respond? By sending flowers? By campaigning to lose so you&#8217;d approve of him? Christ, you&#8217;re even stupider than I thought you were if that&#8217;s the case &#8211; and that&#8217;s pretty stupid. Or, alternatively, you&#8217;ve set the new standard for chutzpah.I <a href=\"http:\/\/www.examiner.com\/a-171760~Marc_Danziger__Democrats_would_be_weaker_without_Lieberman.html\" target=\"browser\">said it once<\/a> and still stand by it:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>Ask yourself this, if you&#8217;re all excited at the notion of Lieberman running against Lamont as an independent. Who do you think is going to be sitting in the Dirksen Building in February of &#8217;07? Lamont? In a state that was &#8211; in 2004 &#8211; 44 percent unaffiliated, 34 percent Democratic, and 22 percent Republican. Come Election Day, what exactly do you think is going to happen?<\/p>\n<p>\nAnd when Lieberman is sitting in his Senate office next year, do you think the Democratic Party will be stronger or weaker for his departure?<\/p>\n<p>\nI say it will be weaker.<\/p>\n<p>\nIt will be weaker because a losing Lamont candidacy will not have local and regional coattails as large as Lieberman&#8217;s &#8211; and I somehow don&#8217;t see Lieberman doing a lot of campaigning for downballot offices in the next few months.<\/p>\n<p>\nIt will be weaker because a senior sitting senator will owe very little allegiance to the national party.<\/p>\n<p>\nWeaker because other senior officials will sit and weigh the cost of party allegiance against the benefit, and will have a concrete example of what party loyalty buys.<\/p>\n<p>\nSo when such bloggers as Markos Moulitsas Zuniga, Chris Bowers, Jerome Armstrong and Jane Hamsher preen that they have pushed &#8220;Rape Gurney Joe&#8221; (Hamsher&#8217;s sobriquet) off the island, there&#8217;s only one problem: They think they are winning in doing so. <\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Right, then. See you all at the inauguration in January.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There&#8217;s an old joke in which &#8220;chutzpah&#8221; (Yiddish for &#8216;nerve&#8217;) is defined by a young man who has killed both his parents and throws himself on the mercy of the court because he&#8217;s an orphan. Today, we have a new definition. Political seer Matt Stoller writes about Joe Lieberman (in response to Lieberman&#8217;s interview at [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1223"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1223\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1223"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1223"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1223"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}