{"id":2250,"date":"2010-02-23T15:58:08","date_gmt":"2010-02-23T15:58:08","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2010-02-24T22:08:08","modified_gmt":"2010-02-24T22:08:08","slug":"where_tone_torp","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=2250","title":{"rendered":"Where Tone Torpedoes Credibility"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/memeorandum.com\/\" target=\"browser\">Memorandum<\/a> leads me to a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/id\/233942\" target=\"browser\">Newsweek review<\/a> of a book that aims to challenge the credibility of climate skeptic Bjorn Lomborg.<\/p>\n<p>Now, I&#8217;m a big believer in challenging people&#8217;s credibility &#8211; that&#8217;s how we dig away to something approaching truth.<\/p>\n<p>But Newsweek science editor Sharon Begley torpedoes her own credibility and undermines the credibility of the review in her lede:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i>In naming roustabout, lumberjack, ironworker, and dairy farmer America&#8217;s &#8220;worst jobs,&#8221; CareerCast.com omitted one whose awfulness is counterbalanced only by its public-spiritedness: fact-checking Bj\u00c3\u00b8rn Lomborg.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Why is fact-checking Lomborg awful? Because you &#8230;ewww &#8230; have to read him?<\/p>\n<p>Sorry, Sharon, but that&#8217;s just unworthy of anyone who would claim to be &#8216;NEWSWEEK&#8217;s science editor.&#8217; Or if not, it tells me something about Newsweek.<\/p>\n<p>Look, I don&#8217;t think Lomborg has a chokehold on truth in this complex issue. Nor do I think Steve McIntyre &#8211; or Phil Jones &#8211; does.<\/p>\n<p>But I do think that the story is clear &#8211; that Jones et alia undermined the necessary process of science &#8211; through error cascade, groupthink, or deliberate policy &#8211; enough to move AGW into the &#8216;possible but unproven&#8217; category. <\/p>\n<p>What we need is constructive, transparent, respectful discussion that tries to sift the facts from the claims.<\/p>\n<p>In her review, she makes reasonable claims that three of Lomborg&#8217;s claims are not supported by his citations. That&#8217;s serious. It would be more serious if she&#8217;d taken the time to map out Lomborg&#8217;s arguments and claim that &#8211; as a hypothetical &#8211; he makes 15 major claims and 10 minor claims and that of the 5 major claims that were checked, 4 of them were unsupported by his footnotes.<\/p>\n<p>As it is, we have a science writer who is apparently virulently anti-Lomborg (see lede) citing a media critic&#8217;s anecdotal claims that several of Lomborg&#8217;s claims aren&#8217;t supported by his citations.<\/p>\n<p>Lomborg responded on his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lomborg.com\/dyn\/files\/basic_items\/118-file\/BL%20reply%20to%20Howard%20Friel.pdf\" target=\"browser\">website<\/a> (pdf)&#8230;it&#8217;s worth checking out. If reading him doesn&#8217;t curdle your stomach, as it appears to do to Ms. Begley.<\/p>\n<p><b>Update:<\/b> Just read the Lomborg reply, and it&#8217;s pretty scathing about Friel&#8217;s claims. The fact that Begley doesn&#8217;t address the direct hits Lomborg seems to make further undermines not his credibility, but hers.<\/p>\n<p><i><a href=\"http:\/\/pajamasmedia.com\/instapundit\/\" target=\"browser\">Instapundit<\/a> visitors<\/i> &#8211; check out the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.windsofchange.net\/archives\/best_news_of_the_week.html\" target=\"browser\">good news<\/a> on climate research&#8230;<br \/>\n&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When reading serious people is full of &#8216;awfulness&#8217;&#8230;what you&#8217;re doing isn&#8217;t science.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2250"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2250"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2250\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2250"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2250"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2250"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}