{"id":472,"date":"2004-08-04T07:31:51","date_gmt":"2004-08-04T07:31:51","guid":{"rendered":"0"},"modified":"2006-09-28T12:08:44","modified_gmt":"2006-09-28T12:08:44","slug":"well_sometimes_no_means_maybe","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/?p=472","title":{"rendered":"Well, Sometimes &#8220;No&#8221; Means &#8220;Maybe&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As Joe notes <a href=\"http:\/\/windsofchange.net\/archives\/005309.php\" target=\"browser\">below<\/a>, Den Beste <a href=\"http:\/\/www.denbeste.nu\/cd_log_entries\/2004\/06\/NomeansNo.shtml\" target=\"browser\">lays the smack down<\/a> on those who suggest that we can conserve our way to energy independence.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p><i><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>If we went all-out, I imagine that we could (over twenty years or so) cut our energy needs by at least 25% and 50% isn&#8217;t out of the question. In the long run it would save us money and it wouldn&#8217;t hurt the environment any, either.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>I&#8217;m afraid not. It is impossible to achieve that much gain solely through technological changes like that.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t mean &#8220;infeasible&#8221; or &#8220;impractical&#8221;, I mean it is physically impossible. To get a 50% gain solely through technology improvements we&#8217;d have to revoke the laws of thermodynamics and figure out how to change the universal electrical constant. I don&#8217;t expect to see that happen in my lifetime.<\/i><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>He makes a good case, which is kind of depressing.<\/p>\n<p>Fortunately, off the debating floor &#8211; in the real world &#8211; he&#8217;s wrong.If you define the question narrowly, to say that the sole change is fixing the technology underlying our economy, he may have a point (although I might be motivated enough to argue it at some point). But on my planet &#8211; Planet Reality &#8211; people change their technology and their behavior in response to scarcity. Have you noticed any new Excursions on your local Ford dealer&#8217;s lot lately? Notice the signs on the Expeditions? You know, those big SUV&#8217;s &#8211; they&#8217;re so 90&#8217;s.<\/p>\n<p>Let look at some economic facts for fun. The folks at DOE have a wonderful site &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.doe.gov\" target=\"browser\">www.eia.doe.gov<\/a> &#8211; that&#8217;s just chock-full of buttery good data. One piece, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.eia.doe.gov\/pub\/international\/iealf\/tablee1g.xls\" target=\"browser\">an Excel file<\/a>, has the gross energy consumption by country by year per dollar of GDP. Let&#8217;s go to the numbers&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>In 1980, the US consumed <b>16,297 BTU per dollar of GDP<\/b>. In 2002, we consumed <b>10,575<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>In 1980, Sweden consumed <b>10,839<\/b>, and in 2002 <b>7,405<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>The average energy consumption per dollar of GDP in the UK, Germany, Italy, and Japan is <b>5,593<\/b>. Japan is an outlier, at <b>3,876 BTU per dollar<\/b>, so let&#8217;s just look at the UK, Germany, and Italy &#8211; <b>their average is 6,165<\/b>.<\/p>\n<p>Now, clearly, there are issues that make us different &#8211; our pattern of sprawl versus their more urbanized, transit-dependent lifestyle. <\/p>\n<p>But we cut 35.1% out of our energy budget in 22 years. Our major industrial competitors are 47% more efficient than we are; the European Big 3 are 42% more efficient than we are.<\/p>\n<p>Do you think that if paid some attention, we could have a significant impact here? And do you think it would change the nature of our relationship with the Middle East?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Den Beste lays the smack down on those who suggest that we can conserve our way to energy independence. He makes a good case, which is kind of depressing. Fortunately, off the debating floor &#8211; in the real world &#8211; he&#8217;s wrong.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=472"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/472\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/marcdanziger.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}